Can anyone explain to me how THE PRIMADONNA OF PROCESS, PATTI can claim to be a proponent of transperancy and yet voted to not even allow the FULL LSC COMMITTEE to to debate whether or not to post the SUPERINTENDENT'S position in order that the full committee could discuss it in front of the larger crowd for the regular meeting and oh, I believe the reporter from the ITEM.
Maybe PATTI made a mistake (like I have at least 3 times) in her word choice. Maybe instead of transparent she meant TRANSLUCENT. Then while you can see something but it is clearly unclear.
No comments:
Post a Comment