The letter from a parent published in the ITEM calling for more openness in our schools raises a couple of very good points. On one level, it's a no brainier. The land, even the building occupies that space in the universe twenty four hours a day. Why shouldn't we have access to it more than just the hours of the school day. Let's get our money's worth out of our tax dollars.
The actions of the principal as they were recounted reflect a rigid interpretation of the rules, policy, or laws that pertain to the legal definition of "trespassing" without regard to who was the violator. "If you shoot first, you won't have to be bothered with asking questions later."
I am sure it was just a coincidence that this principal just happens to be married to the LPS's attorney. We just ALL need to remember who we are here for.
I agree that children should be able to use the schoolyard for after school play. The father's comment about police using common sense regarding what is actually going on was wise. My concern is always lawsuits. If a child gets hurt on school property some parents will work really hard to find a way to sue. Sadly some of our school yards are not in great shape. As a tax payer I don't want to pay for the lawsuit. What about asking the children to come with parent supervision???
ReplyDeleteI see it as being the same as a public park. If the school yard is in no condition for after school play, then it is in no condition forbplay during hours. Would you sue the city in a public park? Some might try, but let's take the price tag off so we can enjoy city life. And yes, mrs Minos seems like an angry person. Is this who we want ruling our kids!
ReplyDelete