Darn, there goes another typo. Really I was talking about linear progression. Since this operation is run on a second-hand shoestring, I have to make do without a copy editor.
So many questions, I wonder who's got answers? First off, who was rumored to be in line for the controversial position of a new Deputy Superintendent's position? No doubt, a mother can't be responsible for the actions of her adult son. BUT I wonder when her son's addiction problems started? Did who he was related to have any bearing on his hiring? What do you think? The fact that he was hired calls into question the wisdom and competence of those doing the hiring.
He has not been working at Ford very long. He was placed there as part of the cavalry to restore some semblance of order when "Coach K" was fired by the administration. This story was well documented by some of my previous blog entries.
If he was battling a drug addiction, not only why was he hired but was this position the "right fit" for him? Working in a "behavior class" is very stressful. Heck with him, what about the kids? They would not be in that class if they did not have difficulties of their own, but they have a RIGHT to a public education. The only "class" they need to be concerned with is where they get their education, not learning the different "classes" of narcotics.
Holy Cow Stanley! The teachers aide that was arrested is Sue Rowe's son? Is she up for the Deputy Superintendant position? Only in Lynn!
ReplyDeleteLike I said in an earlier post, "Lynn, Lynn, City of Friends!".
ReplyDelete