COULD CHUCK REALLY BE ANTI- CHRISTIAN?

Now even the posing of such propaganda can be downright inflammatory and as all of you know I am not really that type? I do have to admit though CHUCK is an easy target and I better get in all of my practice before he leaves public life for a practice of his own.

Okay, let's make the case. First we start with the GORDON COLLEGE  matter. It could be reasonably argued that the vote to sever ties with GORDON COLLEGE was an act of persecution in retribution for them trying to adhere to their CHRISTIAN values and not for some alleged intent to discriminate because no actual case of discrimination has ever been proven to exist. You would think a lawyer would n
know how the constitution works.

Then there was his attempt in the POLICY SUB-COMMITTEE to circumvent the EXEMPTION to IMMUNIZATION based on RELIGIOUS reasons. While he freely admitted that the LSC did not have the authority to actually prevent someone from using it he just wanted to strike it from the policy so that we wouldn't advertise it. Pretty shady if you ask me. (TALK ABOUT INTENT TO DISCRIMINATE!) The matter was tabled and you could sense that the other committee members were a little uncomfortable with this plan of attack.

Finally he wanted to REPEAL the SEX EDUCATION POLICY because he said it was outdated because of a reference to collusion with church partners. Now who am I to judge any one's actual intent, I just everyone to be well grounded in case any lighting bolts strike in the vicinity of BENNETT STREET.