LPS'S OWN DEFLATEGATE

Fresh off a thorough and unbiased investigation, the details of which are chronicled in the WOTRING REPORT, it has been determined that ATTORNEY CHUCK more probably than not had an ulterior motive in getting the LPS administration to devise a proposed budget that included the wishes, AKA needs, of fellow committee members. It is also further found that whereas CHUCK was generally aware of the budgetary protocol and procedure whereas the MAYOR provides DR. LATHAM with a figure that indicates the amount of cash available from the city budget to fulfill its NET SCHOOL SPENDING obligations.

Since the MAYOR was not present when this proposal was made this further leads us to conclude that the TRUE intention of this action was to impinge the INTEGRITY of the MAYOR thereby deflating her presumed popularity with the voting population as evidenced by the last general election. This move was most likely coordinated with the upcoming CITY COUNCIL election designed to get more favorable candidates to ATTORNEY GALLO a competitive advantage in the upcoming election.

These candidates when elected would in turn work to stall any progress set forth by the MAYOR. Once the MAYOR'S popularity was sufficiently damaged then ATTORNEY GALLO would be perfectly positioned to successfully challenge the MAYOR in an upcoming election.

Granted I have no actual evidence to justify these accusations in a court of law but as we have learned by previous reports, the only ruling that really matters comes from the court of public opinion, all circumstancial and happenstancelike.