Requesting anonymity, a HIGH-LEVEL source in the WOTRING SCHOOL COMMITTEE SAGA leaked the following campaign plan.The details of the top-secret disclosure detailed a simple FOREST AND TREES diversion or was that inversion. No matter the source said, :The key noted the strategist turned traitor is that WOTRING wants to strip away all the pageantry of the performance so the truth can be exposed"/
"That's why you won't see any signs cluttering up anybody's yard or sticking to any bumper. He feels that anybody can wallpaper their bathrooms with reams of campaign literature. It's that personal connection you will remember."
Anonymity was requested in lieu of of risking a contempt charge for not appearing before council on the advice of counsel/
plant the seeds Stanley!
ReplyDeleteFlying egos! 'Got a minute? These pols had to think quickly'- recent article in the Daily Item about the candidates.
ReplyDeleteSchool Committee incumbent Charlie Gallo said the schools have made a lot of progress during HIS (and only HIS) first two years on the committee but he’d like to come for two more years to work harder. Does this mean he is using the School Committee as a stepping stone to follow his idol Cahill's footsteps. Meanwhile Cahill is dusting Gallo's footprints off his coat tails. Count the number of times Gallo mentions Cahill's name in debates. It is entertaining to say the least.
Meanwhile, School Committee candidate Lorraine Gately said ..
“And you can bet you’re sweet bippy that’ I’ll work until we have what I call GATELY'S WORLD..,” ----- awe Gaud
The other candidates spoke very well. Why weren't you quoted Stanley
Deleteback to my comment. Gallo is taking credit again for everyone's hard work. awe Gaud
DeletePlease decode. Are you referring to your opponents who are wasting paper cutting trees?
ReplyDeleteBecause more often than not the campaign literature more often than not ends up in the trash. I don't have that kind of money to waste and I am not going to ask for yours to waste. Besides I think it sets too much of a precedent fir wasting money in the budget.
Delete