ABOUT THE NET RE-PAYMENT PLAN, DAN IS THE MAN!

Stanley Wotring <lynn.school.watch@gmail.com>	Aug 31 (2 days ago)
to Dan, richard.colucci, jcerulli, buzzy.barton, hong.net, tyoung

Dear City Councilmen, School Committee members, and other concerned citizens,

Please explain to me how that while the city charter requires anything over a $4 million 

obligation to a bond is required to be put to a vote before the citizens yet the Mayor has 

chosen to negotiate at least a $15 million liability in relative secrecy? The implications of 

such brazen disregard for transparency even if covered by some legal loophole is deeply 

disturbing.

I know I, along with many of my readers look forward to your response.

Sincerely, 

Stanley H. Wotring, Jr.

Dan Cahill	11:02 AM (28 minutes ago)
to me

I am having Jim Lamanna from our legal department put together an explanation of what 

is and what is not permitted with respect and bonding and incurring other types of debts. 

He should be responding to you directly.

Thanks,

Dan

Sent from my iPhone

Stanley Wotring <lynn.school.watch@gmail.com>	11:30 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Dan

Thank you for starting to look into this.